Be Proactive Instead of Reactive

We’re probably the only firm in the investment business who doesn’t have CNBC blaring in the background of the office.  We do have computers that can stream live TV but usually it’s to keep up with shows like The Office or World Cup (when they were showing it).  But we rarely tune into CNBC.  One reason is that I’m afraid of what I’ll do if I’m inundated with news all day.

I can see why people get caught up in short-term thinking watching CNBC.  One day feels like a lifetime given all the stuff that is reported each day.  This company’s earnings.  That company’s lawsuit. This new CEO.  That new product.  This hot new IPO.  That new technology.

And the opinions.  Everybody has an opinion on Wall Street, and CNBC makes sure you know everyone’s opinion.  Every minute of every day. 

It’s enough to drive you nuts.  Or at the very least, enough to make you do things in your investment program that you shouldn’t. 

If you asked the reporters at CNBC if what they’re reporting has lasting significance, I doubt they could say yes, and mean it.  So why do they report it?  Because they have a bunch of time to fill.  So they tell you what the producer price index did this month.  They tell you that payrolls declined 2% for the month.  They tell you of analysts downgrades, upgrades, and opinions.  Does any of this truly matter in the long run?  No.

Reacting to news on CNBC or any other financial media outlet is a loser’s game simply because this information may be “news” only to you.  You are not first on the information food chain.  If you read about something in the Wall Street Journal, you’re not alone.  Millions of other investors also read it, and millions more investors knew about it 24 hours earlier when the “news” actually took place.  It’s silly to think that what you hear on CNBC gives you a leg up in the information game.  Chances are, the stock already is reflecting the information by the time you decide to move on the “news.”

Don’t get chased out of stocks (or any financial instrument) simply because of a single news event that the financial media trumpets as being important.  Chances are, that news event is some trivial piece of data whose primary value is to fill air time.

Rule of 72

I find the Rule of 72 useful when comparing expected returns between stocks and other investments.  The Rule of 72 says that in order to find out how many years it takes your money to double in a particular investment, choose a rate of return and divide it into 72. 

For example, if the long-run average annual return of stocks is 11%, the Rule of 72 means that, on average, stock returns double every 6.54 years (72 divided by 11).  If the long-run average return on bonds is 5% per year, then bonds double every 14.4 years (72 divided by 5). 

Let’s see what happens to a $10,000 investment, over 26 years, earning 11% per year.  That $10,000 will double nearly four times (26 divided by 6.54).  Thus, $10,000 becomes $20,000 becomes $40,000 becomes $80,000 becomes approximately $151,000.

Now, let’s look at bonds.  Since bonds return, on average, 5% per year, the value of the bond doubles nearly twice in 28 years.  That means $10,000 becomes $36,000 at the end of 26 years. 

Which would your rather own-stocks or bonds?  Of course, looking at the current economic conditions – don’t answer that yet, but the moral of this story:  Your money grows best by investing heavily in stocks!

Why You Should Avoid Speculating in Futures, Options, and Speculative Stocks

It’s happened to me.  It will happen to you.

Your investment program is going along quite nicely.  You’ve made some nice gains on stable blue chip company stocks.  But it has gotten boring and it feels like something is missing.  You hear about people making a killing on speculative stocks.  Maybe even heard it on CNBC or some other “trusted” financial channel how some trader managed to score big on some futures trade.  You don’t want to wait 25 years to get rich.  You want BIG profits now!  So you create room in your portfolio by venturing into the options and futures markets.  You buy gold because, hey why not?  Everyone is doing it and it can only go higher from here! 

In short, you stray from your investment approach, to roll dice. 

Big mistake. 

Making money consistently in the futures and options markets is difficult because you have to be right about the investment and the timing.  Buying stocks is an easier way to make a buck.  As long as you’re right on the stock, your timing need not be perfect.  You can wait until your reasons for buying the stock pan out.  When you buy options and futures contracts, the clock starts ticking immediately.  You can’t afford to be patient, hoping your investment thesis comes to fruition.  With options, you have at most nine months for your idea to develop.  That’s not a long time.  Most options expire worthless.  You shouldn’t think yours will be any different. 

Buying initial public offerings (IPOs) usually is another losing game for individual investors.  The problem with buying IPOs is that the best IPOs are not available to individual investors.  All those Internet IPOs you read about that went from $10 to $60 were never available at the $10 price for individual investors like you and me.  Only the best customers of the of the investment firms taking the company public get a piece of the best IPOs.  Oh sure, you can buy the stock after it goes public and has already jumped 300%.  That’s a bad idea, since many IPOs return to their initial offering price over time.  And if you are ever approached by a broker who wants to sell you shares in the next “hot” IPO, run for the hills.  Any IPO in which that’s offered to you and me is just junk that none of the big guys want.  We consider IPOs to be in the “Speculative Stocks” category since most of them have earnings that are hard, if not impossible, to determine.  

Back-testing Annual Stock Predictions

It’s always fascinating to me when major magazine publications such as Money or Forbes issue their annual “Investor’s Guide” in the beginning of the year.  Assuming that most investors rebalance their basket of stocks around the holiday season, let’s take a look at the predictions from Money Magazine for 2010 and see what investors would have made if they followed the advice. 

There are two things to note in this observation.  One is, at the time of this writing it is, October 6th, 2010.  Not even a full year has gone by since these picks were made, so I am merely observing the progress year-to-date.  And two, they cover nearly 200+ stocks, bonds and ETFs in the entire issue and to list them would be too tedious (for both reader and writer).  So, I am simply including those picks with the most “conviction” – that’s when they feature fund managers who have done exceptionally well in the past year.

 Top Picks From Top Pros

That’s the headline for the top five of 2009’s most successful funds.  Now, let’s see how they do this year thus far. 

Bruce Berkowitz/Fairholme (FAIRX):	Money Magazine	Current Price	Gain/(Loss) %	Total Return
Humana (HUM)	$42.04	$50.50	+20.01%
WellPoint (WLP)	$57.43	$55.11	-4.03%
Pfizer (PFE)	$18.32	$17.24	-5.89%
Forest Laboratories (FRX)	$31.19	$31.31	-0.38%
Total Return				+9.71%

David Herro/Oakmark International (OAKIX)	Money Magazine	Current Price	Gain/(Loss) %	Total Return
Toyota (TM)	$83.42	$71.25	-14.58%
Richemont (CFR.VX)	$32.35	$47.70	+47.44%
Publicis Groupe (PUBGY)	$40.21	*$49.70	+23.60%		*Split Adjusted
Total Return				+56.46%

Eric Ende/FPA Perennial (FPPFX)	Money Magazine	Current Price	Gain/(Loss) %	Total Return
Varian Medical Sys. (VAR)	$46.07	$61.81	+34.17%
Signet Jewelers (SIG)	$24.78	$32.62	+31.64%
Total Return				+65.81%

Diane Jaffee/TCW Dividend Focused (TGIGX)	Money Magazine	Current Price	Gain/(Loss) %	Total Return
Packaging Corp. (PKG)	$42.04	$50.50	+20.12%
J.P. Morgan (JPM)	$57.43	$55.11	-4.04%
Pfizer (PFE)	$18.32	$17.24	-5.89%
Total Return				+10.19%

John Rogers/Ariel Appreciation (CAAPX)	Money Magazine	Current Price	Gain/(Loss) %	Total Return
CB Richard Ellis (CBG)	$12.05	$18.03	+49.62%
CBS (CBS)	$13.81	$16.66	+20.63%
McCormick (MKC)	$18.32	$41.73	+127.78%
Total Return				+198.03%

Money Magazine’s Average Total Return: +68.04%  Vs.  S&P 500 Year-to-date:  +2.341%  (Wowza!)

Now, before you fire your stock broker to jump on these hot stocks, there are a few things you should know.  These stocks are coming off of exceptional bottoms from the 2007/2008 housing collapse and have not yet surpassed their peak prices (with the exception of one or two on the list).  While approximately 75% of the total stock market are currently in positive territory year-to-date, only a handful of them have reached back to their 2007 highs.  Obviously, this is only a small sample of those stocks and may not necessarily suit your needs.  But, aside from the technical details, a return of +68.04% in a year is extremely rare, if not impossible only because there are strong psychological forces at work that prevents from achieving that.

By the way, if you’re wondering, here are the figures for each funds’ five year annualized return.

Fairholme (FAIRX): +7.7%
Oakmark International (OAKIX): +6.6%
FPA Perennial (FPPFX): +2.1%
TCW Dividen Focused (TGIGX): -1.8%
Ariel Appreciation (CAAPX): +1.3%

Avoid Forecasting - Learn to Recognize What's Happening Around You

Many people will try to see what they want to see and not necessarily what is actually going on.  Don't fall into that trap.  Be aware of indicators that suggest things may change, but do not get into forecasting.  The greatest investor of them all, Warren Buffett, has saying, "Forecasting tells you how much about the forecaster and nothing about the future!"

If the year 2008 told you anything, it should have told you that there is no such thing as an ever-growing economy.  If you believed that real estate properties will continue to rise because "they're not making more Real Estate," then please read the book, Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (Mackay, 1980), and you'll see that hype existed long before our current "economic recovery," all the previous economies before that and will continue to exist well into future economies!

Ultimately, company values will depend on their financial performance in the long term.  Sure, there are wild short-term swings and great opportunities in the immediate term.  Sure, there were some amazing opportunities during the early part of 2009 (bargain basement prices abound!).  CAM Trading participated in those crazy days too.  But, eventually when the market wakes up, guess what happens to those synthetic prices?  History repeats itself time and again, especially where the stock market is concerned.